FREE Research PDF: 200 Evidence-Based Reasons Not to Vaccinate

infant_vaccine

19th February 2015

By Sayer Ji

Contributing Writer for Wake Up World

Quick download here

(Please read the description for context of what you are getting, and what to do with it.)

The media, your pediatrician, politicians and health authorities like the CDC and FDA claim that vaccines are safe and effective. So why do hundreds of peer-reviewed studies indicate the opposite is true? Read, download, and share this document widely to provide the necessary evidence-based counterbalance to the pro-vaccination propaganda that has globally infected popular consciousness and discussion like an intractable disease.

It is abundantly clear that if the present-day vaccine climate, namely, that everyone must comply with the CDC’s one-size-fits-all vaccination schedule or be labeled a health risk to society at large, is to succumb to open and balanced discussion, it is the peer-reviewed biomedical evidence itself that is going to pave the way towards making rational debate on the subject happen.

With this aim in mind, GreenMedInfo.com has painstakingly collected over 300 pages of study abstracts culled directly from the National Library of Medicine’s pubmed.gov bibliographic database on the wide-ranging adverse health effects linked to vaccines in the today’s schedule (over 200 distinct adverse effects, including death), as well as numerous studies related to vaccine contamination, and vaccine failure in highly vaccine compliant populations.

This is the literature that the media, politicians and governmental health organizations like the CDC, pretend with abject dishonesty does not exist – as if vaccine injury did not happen, despite the over 3 billion dollars our government has paid out to vaccine injured through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund since it was inaugurated in 1986.

We have written extensively about this research previously, highlighting different studies, focusing on translating their implications to the lay persons (view our vaccine article section here), but we believe that collecting and condensing solely the primary literature itself makes a much more powerful statement.

This document is being made free to download to the world at large in order to encourage the lay public, health professionals, activists, and elected officials alike to read, acknowledge and share the voluminous literature with their family, friends, colleagues and related stakeholders. You will find this research undermines the national and global agenda to continue to expand the vaccine schedule (on behalf of a vaccine industry that is indemnified against lawsuit for defective or harmful products), with increasing legislative pressure to remove exemptions and mandate them against the evidence of harm and at best equivocal effectiveness as a preventive health measure.

If the vaccination arm of modern medicine today is to continue to promote itself as a science- and evidence-based practice, it must acknowledge and incorporate the implications of the research we are releasing here, or lose any pretense at credibility. Failing to do so will reveal that the widespread push to remove your choice in the matter is agenda and not evidence driven, and due to the fact that vaccines all carry the risk of irreversible harm and even death (any vaccine insert proves this), it clearly violates the Nuremberg code of medical ethics to promote them as a priori safe and effectiveness.

Vaccination: 200+ adverse effects

Click to download now

Please don’t forget to share this document and/or link far and wide. Thank you!

Also, please sign the Whitehouse petition:

Prohibit Any Laws Mandating the Force and Requirement of Vaccinations of Any Kind.”

Further articles by Sayer Ji:

About the author:

Sayer Ji1 Lime Juice Could Save 100s of Thousands of Lives Each Year

Sayer Ji is an author, educator, Steering Committee Member of the Global GMO-Free Coalition (GGFC), advisory board member of the National Health Federation, and the founder of GreenMedInfo.com – an open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative modalities. His writings have been published and referenced widely in print and online, including Truthout, Mercola.com, The Journal of Gluten Sensitivity, New York Times and The Well Being Journal.

In 1995 Sayer received a BA degree in Philosophy from Rutgers University, where he studied under the American philosopher Dr. Bruce W. Wilshire, with a focus on the philosophy of science. In 1996, following residency at the Zen Mountain Monastery in upstate New York, he embarked on a 5 year journey of service as a counsellor-teacher and wilderness therapy specialist for various organizations that serve underprivileged and/or adjudicated populations. Since 2003, Sayer has served as a patient advocate and an educator and consultant for the natural health and wellness field.

Visit GreenMedInfo online and on Facebook, or sign up for GreenMedInfo’s e-Newsletter.

Please note: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

 


Wake Up World's latest videos

 

Join Wake Up World's Ever Evolving Social Communities

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Google Plus

 

  • Jack Weber

    Thanks, Sayer-Ji. Appreciate the compilation, as always.

  • Carolanne

    Excellent. This is exactly what we need. Thank you!

  • John Cook

    I think this article has been deliberately sabotaged. Try to make sense of this:
    “It is abundantly clear that if the present-day vaccine climate, namely, that everyone must comply with the CDC’s one-size-fits-all vaccination schedule or be labeled a health risk to society at large, is to succumb to open and balanced discussion, it is the peer-reviewed biomedical evidence itself that is going to pave the way towards making rational debate on the subject happen.”

    Don’t feel bad if you couldn’t understand it – it MAKES no sense (except to imply the opposite of what was intended).
    I am a proof reader, and logical, I see things like this often. I encourage authors to be aware and out the person that is the trator.

  • Aaron

    The first 12 of these that I followed the links to and actually read the abstracts of showed the exact opposite of what you claim. You don’t include any titles in the list – you just rename them yourselves and call it “GMI Summary”. But you don’t relate the actual findings of the papers – you reverse them! That’s not even obfuscation – it’s plain old lying. The only accurate ones I could find were the ones that showed a significant correlation coefficient between immunizations and autism – but even those studies make sure to mention that correlation does not imply causation, and that it only means more research is warranted. Also, the breastfeeding one had an accurate “GMI Summary” – but that summary was that breastfeeding can help the mild reactions immediately following a vaccine. Those mild reactions are not something that anybody is refuting – it’s to be expected with a vaccine, and really just shows the health benefit of breastmilk. This is just total crap. I stopped looking after 12 because you had already lost all credibility. This has definitely pushed me to see the scientific validity of the claims that vaccinations are safe – so thanks for that.

  • Jill Caritas

    As others have stated, correlation does not imply causation. As a teacher, I’m incensed that this flat earth nonsense keeps being spewed by the “crunchy” community, invalidating solid science – and putting the kids I teach at risk.

  • TeeJae

    I went to sign the White House petition, and saw that the White House already responded (due to receiving the required number of signatures). While I was pleased that so many people had signed it, I was very DISpleased after reading the White House’s response. It was full of the same old tropes, talking points and false propaganda we’ve been bombarded with for decades. It was infuriating, really.