Corporations Masquerading as Government (Part II): Which “Government” Can We Trust?

By Scott Bartle

Guest Writer for Wake Up World

It appears that Corporations are masquerading as government in countries around the world – for profit and not for the purpose of governance. We know the role of true government is to act as trustees for the people… to provide services to the community, to represent its interests. But do those claiming government status today truly act as our trustees? Does real government still exist? What the FUQ is going on in government today????

Let’s go right back to the beginning… before there was Government.

Natural Trust

When each of us is born, our parents take on the role of Executor of a trust. They appoint Trustees like nannies,  school teachers, dentists etc. to return benefits to you as the Beneficiary. Your parents may make the determinations about your care, but they do so on your behalf until we reach maturity.

When we become of age (whatever age that is) we take on the role of  Executor, and continue to appoint Trustees to return benefits to us as  Beneficiaries. This is a global human phenomenon; even the most isolated tribes in the  deepest jungles appear to behave in the same way. Let’s call this a Natural  Trust.

How Does This Relate To Government?

In the same way we appoint nannies and dentists, we also appoint Government as a Trustee. They perform an  administrative service and return benefits to us as Beneficiaries. We enjoy the  benefits of roads, schools, public health services etc… or at least that’s how it  should work. Most people, I believe, would be comfortable appointing Government  as a Trustee – provided Government functions according to this Natural Trust, and more importantly that Government actually serves the people.

But what if somewhere, something went wrong..?

What if the Government,  appointed as Trustee, started serving another master? What if the actions of Government were benefiting  others – like shareholders?  Would you trust them enough to  appoint them your Trustee?

Inconsistencies in the Representation of “Government”

Let’s first look to the United States. The original Constitution reads “The  Constitution for the United States”. As of 1871, a Constitution was substituted  and reads “The CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”.

So which is it? Which one is legitimate? How many constitutions are  there?

A similar scenario appears to be taking place in Australia. The  Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) tells us that Government  is named “Government of the Commonwealth”.… yet occupying the country’s  capital is the “Australian Government”.

Further inconsistency manifests in the name of the Parliament holding office in Australia. The  Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) defines Parliament as  “The Parliament” or “The Parliament of the Commonwealth”. This is in direct  contrast to the entity called “Parliament of Australia” which is currently occupying the country’s capital.

Surely the Constitutions in both America and Australia aren’t so weak that legal entity names can so easily  be substituted? It doesn’t take a constitutional lawyer to tell you there  are strict rules for altering constitutions; that’s why we have referenda.  But does anyone remember the referenda that enabled these changes to be made?

And is it just the name that’s different..?

Frequently Unanswered Questions.

When such questions are put to “Government”, answers are scarce – if not  completely absent. In a recent case study  involving the importation of a 1959 Chevrolet Corvette into  Australia, “Australian Customs & Border Protection Service” were challenged  to provide evidence they were in fact a legitimate Department of the de jure  Government of the Commonwealth of Australia.  After twelve months of questioning at all levels of Government, no answers have been forthcoming.  “Ministers”, “Judges”, “Commissioners”, “Departments”, “Governors”, and even the Prime Minister –  all remain silent.

So who are they?  Are they really Government? So far, no “Government” official has been willing to attempt an  explanation; to demonstrate their legitimacy as representatives of true government.

But is a government’s refusal to provide evidence of its legitimacy really good  enough? Is that what you expect of a  Government that is supposed to act as your trustee?  What happened to  accountability in Government?  Should 12 months without answers be taken AS the answer…??

Accountability in Government… in the Words of JFK

So what happened to accountability in government?  Surely questions related to the lawful validity of  Government are not simply vexatious? Rather, isn’t a “Government” official who declines scrutiny into the lawful validity of  their office claiming to be above the law?

In 1961  US President John F Kennedy made a speech to the American Newspaper Publishers  Association that everyone in Government – and those who  believe Government do not have to answer to the people –  should listen to.

He stated: “Government at all levels must meet its obligation to provide you  with the fullest possible information, outside the narrowest limits of national  security…. We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors, and we expect you to  point them out when we miss them” said Kennedy.  Those are powerful words.

So if this is the case, does real government  simply shut up when its validity is challenged? Or does it attempt to address the concerns of those it is  supposed to serve, especially as public pressure to do so continues to mount? And if they don’t serve us…. who ARE they serving??  What would happen if the “Government” started to act as the Executor of a  trust – dictating rules, codes and statutes to you? What happens if  “Government” started demanding that benefits be returned to them..?

How could  this happen..?

Corporate “Government” Trust

Let’s consider for a minute the scenario of a Corporate Government Trust, in which the “government” plays the role of Executor. Would a “government” acting as Executor take questions from it’s  Trustee? Would the “Government” create a legal entity to which you act as Trustee? Perhaps upon the registration of your birth? Do governments address you … or a LEGAL ENTITY? More importantly, does the silence of government on these questions provide the “fullest possible information” that President  Kennedy spoke about??

What can we do about this..?

The first action appears to be to determine the capacity in which “Government”  acts. Who are they actually serving..? This question is critical. But I don’t expect this information to be any more forthcoming of government than the answer of their legitimacy. So in the meantime, there are other things we can do in our interactions with Corporate Government.

  • Some offer to accept the role of Trustee to their Corporate Government on the condition that  they be paid an annual fee to be the Trustee… say $1,000,000 p.a.
  • Others provide terms and conditions to their Corporate Government, which set out fees and charges applicable for acts of the pretence to real government.

Either of these two approaches would collapse if those claiming government  status were able to demonstrate their legitimacy. But these actions have been shown to stop Corporate Government agencies in their tracks. Does this sound like the actions of a Trustee of the people? Or an Executor and Beneficiary of a corrupted system?

More importantly, how many challenges to the lawful validity of government have been met with  the proof demanded by its people?

So what the FUQ do we do next?

  • In dealings with any government representative, ask them ONE SIMPLE QUESTION:  Can you please demonstrate that today’s government (the one you represent) is the same one as established at the inception of this country? It is the onus of any person or entity claiming government status to prove they act on behalf of legitimate government. Until they can demonstrate this, don’t deal with them.
  • Sign the petition  to  ask Her Majesty, The Queen for the truth about the “Australian Government”; something all levels of the “Australian Government” have been unwilling or unable to provide.
  • Share this article. The Corporate Government phenomenon is not limited just to the United States, the UK, or Australia.  Increasingly,  Governments around the world are behaving as Executors and Beneficiaries, not as Trustees of their people. We all have a right to know… which “Government” can we trust?  

Read Part 1: Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia? Worldwide?

About the Author:

Scott spent 12 years working aboard luxury mega yachts for some of the richest and fussiest people on the planet. His travels took him throughout the Mediterranean, Caribbean with voyages through the Indian and Pacific Oceans and islands. Encountering Customs and Immigration formalities was commonplace as Captain.  More recently Scott has worked in mining relying on his degree in project management.

With a keen eye for detail Scott has observed inconsistencies in “Government” and contributes this article from his findings.

Visit truth-now.net  for more information.

 


 

  • http://theseedsofthought.wordpress.com/2012/12/09/rethinking-democracy-in-australia/ Suzy

    You may be interested in my thoughts on the subject of democracy from an Australian perspective. S.
    ww.theseedsofthought.wordpress.com/2012/12/09/rethinking-democracy-in-australia/

  • http://Website KEN

    I wrote a ” letter to the editor ” and sent it some local papers concerning SCOTT’s research — and I noticed some changes in attitude in local business people I deal with — MUCH MORE SUBDUED — NOT AS ARROGANT — which leads me to believe that there may be many A mericans involved in the CORPORATION and its activities

  • http://Website Derrick

    I read this on the 21st Dec 2012
    Maybe and hopefully this relates to the New consciousness awakening foretold by the Mayans
    Or possibly the collapsing of the corrupt world systems that the doom and gloomers fear
    I hope it is the first mentioned leading to a Golden age of enlightenment and prosperity
    Well done Scott.

  • http://ourwonderlife.com/ ying

    The Federal Reserve is not a Government body, as many many believe, but run by the Banks, that’s why it bailed them out.
    watch the Secret to Oz

    and note JFK was trying to bypass the Federal Reserve before being assassinated
    http://shadowgovernment.wordpress.com/2007/01/12/15/

    • http://makefreedom.com lizard

      Yes, and so was Lincoln as he was printing his own money supply. As well, if you look closely you can tie both James Garfield, and William McKinley’s deaths back to banking interests as well.

  • http://makefreedom.com lizard

    When someone with an estate dies, an executor or personal representative as designated in the
    will/trust or by law is appointed by the court.

    Your first and second diagram are both incorrect. An executor acts primarily when the trust is being dissolved and the benefits distributed to the beneficiaries. Thus in the first diagram what we actually see is the parents as Trustees, dentists and things of the sort as contractors, and the children as beneficiaries. If you disagree, then please answer me this, what person has died that the executor needs to wrap up the estate?

    The second diagram is actually representative of 2 trusts or a trust and a sub-trust the first where the government is the trustee managing affairs on you behalf as the beneficiary in agreement with social compacts (an invisible contract) and where you have no say (unless established otherwise), the second where you have been appointed or act in the best interest of the child as a trustee to manage the affairs thereof. Otherwise, as an executor what affairs are you wrapping up as far as estate, or in short “What person has died?”

    Your third diagram is also incorrect, and can be proven the Government/IRS is acting as Trustee, not executor. Please refer to title 42 and look-up both trust 2 and 62. If you dig further you will see the structure thereof. As the government is handling and managing the affairs of your life it is acting as trustee, the court or executive branch upon death is acting as executor. Thus if you establish both a trust and the bylaws thereunder for yourself to manage those affairs as Trustee you will have the power to manage the energy of your life’s work.

    If you would like more information please feel free to contact us.

    Sincerely,
    Sovereign Filing Solutions

    Address:

    #337 PMB5656
    Jonesboro Road Suite #111
    Lake City, Georgia
    [ Near 30260 ]
    Non-Domestic/Non-Assumpsit

    Phone:

    (517) 391-0373

    Website:
    http://www.SovereignFilings.com

    E-Mail:
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    Skype:
    soveriegn_filing_solutions

    • Ben Eli

      To answer your question of what “person has died”. All of us…

  • http://Website Sandu

    Elizabeth II is not the legitimate ruler of Britain; and the fraud and cover-up go back at least to “Queen” Victoria. See:
    http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No4.html

    The entire family of royals, throughout Europe are not what they seem. When people find out the truth, we will finally have accountability!

  • http://Website John

    How ever you mince or interpret the words – the legalese – at the very simplest level, the corporate entities ACTING as government have stepped way over the boundaries that were drawn up to protect the rights – the unalienable rights – of the people.

    “Governments” breach our trust, break their own laws and commit treason every single day.

    Governments are supposed to serve the people, not the other way around.

  • http://Website gilbert hoops

    Wake up people,we are the only ones who can fix this.The time is now! If we all step up we will change the world for the better.

  • http://Website Sue

    Is it true we are going to be put into detention centers because the constitution is no longer valid and we will be under control of the UN? If so what can I do to stop it?

  • Sue Maynes

    Questions regarding this matter have currently been accepted by the International Court of Justice in Strasbourg. The research covers over 14 years of work and we are waiting on a Directions Hearing now. The result of that will establish if this is our legitimate government or not. We know it is not – but until it is proven legally, we have to keep battling them. WHEN we win – they will have to answer to We the People of the Commonwealth of Australia. For anyone interested in discussion and documentation join the facebook group The Commonwealth of Australia.

  • http://Website Kevin Moore

    Democracy is the opiate of the asses.

  • Rainer

    Hi Scott, you are a legend, I have followed your story with the Corvette earlier on. There seems to be an awakening in Australia but the average Aussie is still too well off and not really motivated. Look at the work that John Wilson has done and others , there are also too many small groups which need to be united into a strong peace force which tesla the truth
    Unfortunately the media is, as you know, manipulated by these gangsters and banksters who owns the media.
    The ave Aussie has to hurt before he moves and if that ever happens we have a chance.
    Keep up the good work!
    Regards
    Rainer

  • Ben Eli

    beautiful…:)

Translate »