Were The Planes of 9/11 Military Cargo Carriers and Not Commercial Airlines?

Close up of South Tower Plane

Our first article on the subject of September 11, 2011 detailed the little known implosion of World Trade Centre # 7. Today, we will investigate further questions of the official story.

How could  the most powerful country on earth with the best defence that money can buy be defenseless against  an attack like  9/11?

First let me say,  I do not believe the official US government position in regards to the four “planes” that crashed on 9/11. I don’t believe that these planes were commercial airliners  –  as you will see there are many eye witnesses accounts that confirm that the planes which hit the twin towers did not have any windows and they were both totally grey and  without  commercial markings – a description more fitting of military cargo carriers than commercial carriers.  I still have not seen any convincing evidence to suggest that the Pentagon was hit by a plane, rather  I have seen and heard overwhelming evidence that the damage at the Pentagon  was caused by a missile.

But that is an entire article in itself.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth

“Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organisation of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe who have gathered together for one purpose. They are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Their main focus concentrates on the four flights, manoeuvres performed and the reported pilots. They stand with the numerous other growing organisations of Fire-fighters, Medical Professionals, Lawyers, Scholars, Military Officers, Veterans, Religious and Political Leaders, alongside Survivors, family members of the victims. They do not accept the 9/11 Commission Report and/or “hypothesis” as a satisfactory explanation for the sacrifice every American has made and continues to make.”   Source

Aircraft Departure Gate Positional Data Conflicts with Government Story

02/28/11 – (PilotsFor911Truth.org) It has been reported that American Airlines Flight 77 departed Washington Dulles International Airport at approximately 08:20 AM on the morning of September 11, 2001 allegedly from Terminal Concourse D Gate 26 (1). However, the Flight Data Recorder positional data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board tells a very different story.  Is this a possible aircraft swap before they even left the ground? Pilots For 9/11 Truth discover evidence of possible airborne aircraft swaps. Further details and visuals  can be found here.

United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash – According To ATC/Radar  (this is the plane that supposedly crashed near Shanksville Pennsylvania).

04/28/09 (PilotsFor911Truth.org) – Recently it has been brought to our attention that Air Traffic Control (ATC) transcripts reveal United 93 as being airborne after it’s alleged crash. Similar scenarios have been offered with regard to American 77 and American 11 showing an aircraft target continuing past its alleged crash point in the case of American 11, or past the turn-around point in the case of American 77. Read the  full article here.

What Happened to the Plane?

The first two photos below are the only 2 official pictures of the crash that were released by the FBI. There are some very strange things occurring here.

1st – Why has a massive crater been generated from a plane crash?

2nd – Where is all the plane debris? There should at least be an engine or two lying around, a tail, some wing pieces, or indeed  any evidence that a plane actually crashed at this site.

Flight 93 FBI Photo

Flight 93 Crash Site - FBI Photo

Here is a massive great hole in the ground in Pennsylvania!

Here is a typical plane crash. Debris everywhere!!

Pentagon Survivor April Gallop Suing Rumsfeld, Cheney, Myers

April Gallop, an Army Officer who was stationed at the Pentagon on 9/11 is now suing top government officials for their possible role in the attack and failure to evacuate the pentagon with prior knowledge of the impending attack

“The ex-G.I. plaintiff alleges she has been denied government support since then, because she raised ‘painful questions’ about the inexplicable failure of military defenses at the Pentagon that day, and especially the failure of officials to warn and evacuate the occupants of the building when they knew the attack was imminent” said Veale in a media advisory.

For full article, full lawsuit complaint, as well as discussion, click here

Analysis of New Evidence of  Onboard Phones

Did American Airlines 77 — the flight that, according to the official conspiracy theory about 9/11, struck the Pentagon — have onboard phones? This question is relevant to the possible truth of the official theory, because Ted Olson, who was then the US Solicitor General, claimed that his wife, Barbara Olson, called him twice from this flight using an onboard phone. You can read the entire article here.

Strangely, the below is a response to a question posed to American Airlines in regards to onboard phones on  their flights:


Thank you for contacting Customer Relations. I am pleased to have the opportunity to assist you.

That is correct we do not have phones on our Boeing 757. The passengers on flight 77 used their own personal cellular phones to make out calls during the terrorist attack.

However, the pilots are able to stay in constant contact with the Air Traffic Control tower.

Chad Kinder
Customer Relations
American Airlines

New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth

Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77, which The 9/11 Report claims hit the Pentagon. Analysis of the data contradicts the official account in direction, approach, and altitude. Data suggests the plane was too high to hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the building. View the full article here

There Were No Windows on Flight 175

Put simply, it can’t have been a commercial passenger liner.

WTC South Tower Flight 175 Attack – Not a Commercial Flight

So if it was not commercial flights that crashed, but rather plain, grey, windowless cargo planes, the next natural question is “What happened to the passengers of the supposed crashed planes?” Perhaps we will never know.  Needless to say, there were numerous anomalies in regard to passenger boardings on  all four flights. For a detailed  examination of the events on the day, please check out this article.

So again, it is apparent that the official 9/11 story of the “planes” does not hold up to scrutiny. This is further evidence that there is a lot more to what happened on that fateful day then what we are being told. As time goes on it is apparent that the US government allowed this to occur. Did they have a direct hand in the operation of 9/11? There is certainly evidence in media or foreknowledge, and the details released through official channels simply don’t add up.

What is clear is that the United States government was able to further its global agenda after 9/11, exercising further controls over the US  population with new liberty-stealing  laws that would have never been able to be passed if it were not for the events of 9/11. These events also created  the  impetus for the US government  to  start two unjust wars in the middle east, which (not surprisingly) is a cash making machine for those involved  –  namely but not limited to Dick Cheney’s company Halliburton.


Did you find this article helpful?

If so, please consider a donation to help the evolution of Wake Up World and show your support for alternative media.

Your generosity is greatly appreciated.

Wake Up World's latest videos

  • Wake Up World

    Jack please do some research of your own, don’t take corporations words as face value.

    These airplanes were still flying in the air AFTER they were meant to have flown into the WTC

    Here is one of many links you can find on this – http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=14399

  • Someoldlesbian

    I have one for ya. There were no planes, and what we did see was a hologram. If it was a plane, there should have been some resistance on impact. There was none. There should have been some seats in debris pictures, but they seem to be missing, empty or occupied. The flash was a homing devise for the missiles that went into those towers like a hot knife to butter. Just my two cents, and years of studying this.

    • TheBigOne

      The Twin Towers and Building 7 were specially re enforced to handle a direct Boeing 747 crashing head on in the event of an error as one of the common questions of the construction methods before 9/11 was how the towers would handle an airliner crash at high speed which was likely given at some point in time regardless at who was behind the wheel.

  • Someoldlesbian

    DNA collected and tagged but no seats out of 4 planes. If one thinks about the lack of resistance when the attack happened at the towers, you would have to think a plane would fold like a lawn chair. or have a wing bounce off, or tail left behind. I NEVER expected to be a “no planer”. It happened on day while watching a video call 9/11 remember the jumpers. At the 18 second mark you see the attack on the tower. If you slow it down and watch it frame by frame, that “plane” turns into a missile. IMO. Then you see it sink into the building without ANY resistance. A plane should have some resistance.

  • Someoldlesbian

    A plane should have resistance, and falling debris scattered around the WTC. When did they do a reconstruction of any of the 4 planes. Oh that’s right, they didn’t. Not even for Shanksville did they do it. Why not? There was a report that someone on board said a missile hit the plane, then we have the “let’s Roll” feel good story. Why not reconstruct? Flight 800 got brought back up from the Atlantic. Flight 93 is supposed to be in a hole in the ground. Dig it up, put it back together again. Do your job FAA.

  • Kyle

    For starters we had and still have all our military in one spot in Bremerton WA which is Pearl Harbor The Extended Edition waiting to happen.

    Bill Clinton’s defunding the military kept us asleep in *la la* land to threats of outside terrorism regardless if it’s a bomb or a plane BUT he was smart enough to pass the blame to Bush which everybody fell for hook line and stinker…I mean sinker as he slipped quietly away from the scene of the crime.

    See here for more details on what I am referring to as those words above are my own but here is the link to the owners blog whoever he is.


    Here is an excerpt of his blog.

    The RENSE article, On 911 An Ill Wind Blew To Booker School:


    …established that THE KEY to 9/11 was a NW WIND weather forecast. The NW wind was required to blow the smoke plume from the North Tower over the South Tower to hide the operation of the MILITARY HELICOPTER. It remote-controlled the incoming airliner, a Boeing 737 (NOT the UA Flight 175 Boeing 767) and, after 59 minutes, started the demoliton charges that were preset in the South Tower.

    Please review the RENSE article, CBC 911 Video Secrets Revealed:


    State-of-the-art weather forecasting permits 5 day forecasts with a high degree of accuracy and thus the 9/6 WEATHER FORECAST for a NW WIND triggered the ‘events’ of 9/11. The ILL WIND article pointed out the need for key players to get into their 9/11 positions, such as BUSH I operating at the White House and BUSH II setting up his alibi at Booker School in Florida. POWELL was off to Mexico, GREENSPAN was off to Switzerland, etc. The rule was if they were out of town on 9/11 they were setting their alibis far away from the crime scene. With many New Yorkers dying from Ground Zero contamination anyone with foreknowledge had an especially good reason to get out.

    Obviously, Bush Administration insiders rushed to cover their backsides but they weren’t alone. THE AGE, Melbourne’s best newspaper, announced on 9/7 that Clinton was coming out of the blue to to spend 9/11 in Australia, his first visit in Melbourne. No Hillary, Chesela, US press, no bags?

    Later CBS News interviewed Clinton:

    The 42nd president of the United States was in Australia when the Sept. 11 attack occurred. “I remember it vividly, recalls Mr. Clinton, who says his first thought was that “Osama bin Laden did this.”


    HOWEVER, on 9/8 THE AGE announced Australian PM Howard was going to ‘visit’ Washington, D.C. ‘next week’ presumably meaning circa 9/11. The alleged reason for his visit was to discuss a free trade agreement with Bush. At the minimum they got their wires crossed as BUSH II was off to Florida on 9/10 which another article said was the meet-up date. In fact, with Bush II flying all over the southern US on 9/11 afraid to deal with 9/11 crime (for good reason) there never was a meet-up.

    That article hints that Bush was hanging Howard out to dry over a free trade agreement. At the time Bush was trying to get free trade agreements with 34 countries YET ‘American Farmers’ were against a free trade deal with Australia. Later events indicate a poker game was in place to suck Howard and Australia into the Iraq War quagmire and Howard was probably promised in private that Aussie support for invasion would bring the free trade deal. As a result Howard fell into the trap and travelled the US, UK, and Australia SELLING the Iraq War. HOWEVER, there was a fly in the honey: Australia was dependent on Iraq for BILLIONS of dollars in wheat sales annually. Iraq officials promptly cut off wheat sales. Australia wheat farmers and opposition political party officials came out in force to oppose the loss of wheat sales and the nonsense of invading Australia’s best customer, Iraq.

    End of quote.

    Now I believe that’s partially what allowed WW2 to happen we had all our military in one spot just waiting for an attack which is why Pearl Harbor was so devastating.

    Most of our West Coast defense was over there with some in San Diego.