By Ken Bartle
Guest Writer for Wake Up World
Suppose that the word Ê»personÊ¼ (by definition) has been misconstrued in meaning. Suppose that in our society, a ‘person’ is a LEGAL ENTITY, a thing, an artificial construct and not a Ê»living beingÊ¼. Suppose that you are blissfully ignorant of this deception, and truly believe that you are a “person”.
What if your government considers a ‘person’ to be a corporate entity? And what if, without your knowledge or consent, you are legally responsible for a corporate entity that bears your name? And as a consequence you are bound by rules and laws that were meant to govern commerce, not people?
What ill consequences might arise from your ignorance? And who might benefit from this misunderstanding? LetÊ¼s look.
So what is a person? Is a “person” a Ê»thingÊ¼, is it a legal entity, or is it a Ê»living beingÊ¼? That needs to be clear.
This article pursues the concept of the Ê»personÊ¼ and exposes our system of ‘identification’ as a most damnable and contemptuous crime.
“I’m that person”
Imagine you arrive at the front desk of your local government office and youÊ¼re asked if you have any personal ID. “Yes, no problem” you say, as you flash your photo ID card or passport saying, “IÊ¼m the person”.
Suppose a ‘person’ is actually a LEGAL ENTITY. HavenÊ¼t you just and agreed to act on behalf of that ‘artificial person’ in your capacity as a Ê»living beingÊ¼? HavenÊ¼t you have just agreed to continue the deception? And since you consented to this monstrous deception, would it shock you that corporatised Ê»governmentsÊ¼ use that consent to treat you as a LEGAL ENTITY, an artificial Ê»personÊ¼, in all that it does and in every court in the country? Does it shock you that Ê»governmentÊ¼ demands every self-serving compliance it can get away with? That it owns your drivers licence, your passport, your birth certificate, your kids, your education, their education, your health, your property title, your car?
And how would you feel to learn that every time you use the word Ê»personÊ¼, you endorse a criminally deceptive legal perversion that underpins the most heinous crime in human history; the theft of your life, your identity, your freedom, and that of your family and friends?
What is a “person”?
Oxford Dictionary defines ‘identification’ as:
“a means of proving a person’s identity, especially in the form of official papers”. [emphasis added]
Google provides a multitude of answers to the question – “original meaning of person?” My trusty Mac summed all of them succinctly.
ORIGIN Middle English: from Old French ‘persone’, from Latin persona, Ê»actor’s mask, character in a playÊ¼, later Ê»human being.Ê¼
LetÊ¼s go right back to its Latin origins – persona, actor’s mask, character in a play. The word ‘person’ denotes a mask, a presumed character, a concealment of sorts, something under the covers that only deliberate inquiry may reveal.
So what might the word ‘person’ be hiding?
Let’s start by defining the legal meaning of the word Ê»personÊ¼. There are two persons identified in law: these are “natural-person” and “artificial-person”.
LetÊ¼s try to define “Natural person”. Several definitions emerge from Google:
- a human being, naturally born, versus a legally generated juridical person.
- ‘natural person’ refers to a human being as opposed to a legally-created entity, like a Corporation, Limited Liability Company, General Partnership, Limited Partnership, etc.
- A natural person is any human being, with legal capacity commencing from the time of birth.
- A living, breathing human being, as opposed to a legal entity such as a corporation.
- A living human being. Legal systems can attach rights and duties to natural persons without their express consent.
All resources agree on “human being”, but there seems far too much divergence of opinion to clearly define Ê»natural personÊ¼. Qualifiers and dis-qualifiers abound; none are definitive.
Further research brought the website natural-person.ca into focus, particularly because it offers some words of caution.
- Two key words that are re-defined in almost every Statute are the words “person” and “individual”. There are only two “persons” in law, a human being, and everything else: a natural-person is a legal entity for the human-being. An artificial-person is a legal entity that is not a human being.
Did you spot it?
In almost every Statute”, there are two types of “persons”, and both are legal entities; one for the living being, and one not a living being. But did you notice it does not say that a Ê»natural-personÊ¼ is legally “OF” the living being, but is an entity “FOR” the living being? Is it logical that if the “natural-person” is a Ê»legal entityÊ¼ FOR a living human, then “natural-person” has no humanity to it. (E.g. a door FOR a shed is a door; it cannot also be a shed.)
Whatever happened to the “breathing”? What happened to all that flesh and blood?
Well, according to your LEGAL status, flesh and blood doesn’t exist. The definition of the phrase “natural-person” does not include the living beingÊ¼s “Life characteristics”; those Ê»lifeÊ¼ elements which prove life is present, have been disqualified. A “natural-person” is something constructed to serve a human being, and so must be some Ê»thingÊ¼ other than human. It does not live. This “natural-person” is dependent for all its actions upon a living, breathing human being.
Does this surprise you? And would it surprise you to know you were not supposed to notice this distinction… like it is masked in legality and deceit?
Person or human?
Let’s examine this idea.
There are only two “persons” in law, a human being, and everything else. Sounds simple enough. WhatÊ¼s to explain further?
Every human being is considered by the legal system to be a “person”. You are a member of the (legal) “person” club, and as an unknowing member of that club, a “natural-person” entity has been created for you. It hides under the mask of “person” and, deceptively, shares your name. And if you accept your Ê»membershipÊ¼ by flashing your ID card, you are accepting and confirming that you are an artificial person.
The word Ê»artificialÊ¼ means made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally, typically as a copy of something natural. So an Ê»artificial personÊ¼ is seemingly a man made copy – but of what?
An artificial person is a legal entity that is not a human being, but for certain legal purposes is considered by virtue of statute to be a natural person.
Is your understanding complete yet, or is the wolf still circling?
Government created an artificial thing that is non-human, a Legal Entity, and labelled it an ‘artificial person’. Government statutes also create a Ê»natural personÊ¼ entity, which enables the Ê»living beingÊ¼ to act for the Ê»artificial personÊ¼ – and be bound by rules applicable only to ‘artificial persons’.
So what does this mean?
Most people will accept that there is something about “government” that doesn’t feel right; that our current social structure doesn’t really benefit us, or our ailing environment. In a world of beauty and abundance, we work unreasonably long hours in concrete cities, foregoing our own desires, to barely scrape by. Why? To fit into a system of controls that existed long before each of us was born.
But think about it. If “the system” doesn’t benefit you, who does it ultimately benefit? It must work to someone’s advantage. It’s just not you!
And now we’re starting to understand how this all came to pass.
Government is not stupid. It recognised that a real, live human-being was an indispensable factor in activating this legal entity, to give it “life” and activity…. i.e. to open envelopes, vote to uphold government, write letters, pay on demand, get the kids vaccinated, attend court, apply for a license, pay registration fees, pay the extortion fee (fine) for parking longer than 60 minutes — all so that government could make money from your existence. Which it inevitably does.
Surprised? Don’t be. Government is a corporation after all!
But how many people really know and understand that what we consider “government’ is not real government, that it only masquerades as such? TheyÊ¼ve hidden this fact well, and for a very long time.
So what else have governments hidden? YouÊ¼ve guessed haven’t you? Persons.
Government recognised that it needed to mask this ‘person’ scam and keep it from public view. Otherwise, who would play along? Without your agreement (albeit by deceit) to play along, to represent the LEGAL ENTITY, government knows it cannot exercise control over your being. Government knows that it cannot legitimately exercise authority over living beings, as it is itself the creation of living beings. In the natural hierarchy, human trumps institution every day of the week.
So, to facilitate its system of control, government went back to Latin…. and presto! There was the word persona – a mask. The word fitted its purpose to perfection! And by misconstruing its meaning in common usage, living breathing human beings unknowingly accept the obligations imposed by law on the Legal entities created in our names.
The definition of Ê»personÊ¼ now makes perfect sense, doesnÊ¼t it? An Ê»actor’s mask’, a ‘character in a play’. And what better mask than to have a “Natural Person” act as a bridge to the LEGAL ENTITY – the “artificial person”? Better yet, why not put the Ê»natural personÊ¼ (an entity created “for” the living being) in the same court (pun intended) with the non-living Ê»artificialÊ¼ person, so that Lawyers can put more knots in the corporate noose that today has us all hanging by our necks?
By skilfully using the word “person” for both entities, government has hidden the mask right under your nose. We have been led to believe that a “person” is a human being – full stop. So we accept the legal ownership of the “person” LEGAL ENTITY (created by government) and in the process forego our basic human rights to the will of government.
BlackÊ¼s Law Fictionary Dictionary (9th Ed.) says this about “Artificial Persons”: